Showing posts with label fix. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fix. Show all posts

Monday, May 2, 2011

The IPL Horrors Lumber On

And so the craze, the indulgence, the ego trip drones on yet again. The IPL is a sharp plummet in cricket quality from the world cup event we just witnessed and enjoyed, this is more like a drunken after party before the real cricket begins again.

Lets set one thing straight. I like Twenty20 cricket. I believe it does have a place in the cricketing calendar, it is short, entertaining, and its all over quickly, sort of like a fun-size mars bar. It serves as a great live spectator sport, and for a while there everybody understood this, teams played along for a quick bit of fun before the real tour began.

Yep, not taking it seriously. © Getty

And then India won the Twenty20 World Cup. You see, India weren't even on board to start with. It took off in England and Pakistan, along with a handful of internationals. But after India took the honours in that admittedly fun little event, things went overboard. The love child that spawned became a cricketing monster, driven by the idea of milking the concept completely dry. The abomination known as the IPL was born, and here its legacy:

1. Overpaid Players
We all know that professional sports players are paid obscenely. Try Fernando Torres being bought for €58.5m, or (I love this one) Latrell Sprewell rejecting a $21m (USD) contract because he had "a family to feed". I guess he fathers a small island.

Cricket was once exempt from this madness, but the IPL changed all that. Gone are the day where you earn an honest pay packet and put pride above all else. Now we are talking $2.4m (US) for a couple of months of trigger happy madness. It seems like small change compared to other sporting codes, but look at our international cricketers flock to the gold. It will come to a stage were players will give up international commitments to turn out for the Nagpur Nobodys (the West Indies leading by example already).

2. Bollywood Meets Cricket
If I wanted to see Shah Rukh Khan and friends dancing, hamming, and drowning in their petty games, I know where to go, the nearest cinema. We let you have your bollywood movies, it's ok to be a fan, but please leave cricket alone.

Ugh. © AFP

3. Force Fed Advertising
Money money money, again. We have advertising thrown at us with such ferocity, between overs, between balls (!) and even during the live game by cutting the screen into an L-shape advertisement. The sponsorship banners and logos are sprawled everywhere on the ground, the boundries, and on the players kits. Everyone is out to make a quick buck, and it hurts my eyes.

4. Unfair Cricket
Ponder this. You are a young indian fast bowler looking to press for national selection, your strengths are good line and length with a hint of swing. Your assignment is Adam Gilchrist with a license to kill. Your constraints are shortened boundary ropes, a sea of spectators screaming for sixes and a pitch resembling dead wood. They might as well decapitate you too.

How are the domestic level Indian cricketers supposed to develop their trade? Bowlers get smashed everywhere, and only exceptions like Malinga have the tools to cope. Batting skills such as working the gaps, finding the singles, running between the wickets... all gone. Despite the world cup victory, Indian cricket is going through a massive shortage of good bowlers and test match level batsmen, and this is the very reason.

5. Dumb Commentary
These are real excerpts of cricinfo commentary:
  • Rayuduuuuuu! Whaddaplayaaaaa!
  • Clatterrrrrrrr! Don't mess with Malinga! 
  • ... he walks down and tries to work it to leg but ends up with a thick outside-edge that flies over and over third man! Wow!
  • ...oh he has literally smoked the pants off that one!
  • snuff is snuff, says McCullum
There is a fine line between flair and idiocy. And this is just text commentary, the audio commentators take it to another level, wailing in their chorus of never ending praise of "outstanding batting" and "incredible shot". 


6. The 'Team' Culture

There was a bit of team culture being developed over the seasons with familiar faces partnering each other, however this was all down the toilet with the ridiculous idea of putting all the players back in the lolly scramble. Name three players in the Bangalore Royal Challengers? 

"Of course, thats Dravid's team, along with Kallis, Uthappa... "
"Uh actually, Dravid is in the Royals, Kallis in Kolkata, Uthappa Pune."
"Pune? A new team?"
"Two new teams, them and the Kochi Tuskers."
"Tuskers!? From a land with a bad reputation of elephant poaching! But hey at least we see Kallis and Gayle together, exciting!"
"Actually... Gayle is in Bangalore now".
"..."


The Final Word
Given a bit of restraint (something not possible with Indian cricket), the IPL could have worked as a two week glamor event. Some of the games in this latest edition were actually a bit of fun, but two months of this? Those naysayers who complain about the world cup length are nothing but a bunch of hypocrites. The only cricket serving we have is this biffathon and the West Indies A vs Pakistan series (yawn). 


Somebody save us.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

How To Fix The World Cup

Time for an admission. As much as I have been rooting for the ODI game and the 2011 world cup, it has failed to address the same problems every world cup has had since 1996. I do enjoy watching minnow teams take on the best, but unfortunately the proportion of one-sided games is far too high. Unlike most pundits and journalists though, I wont simply put the boot into the game, I am going to offer a solution.

The Current Format
Two pools of seven, therefore a total of 21 games per pool, and a total of 42 pool matches.

I prefer this format to the super sixes/eights format which added a lot of bloat to the tournament. The point of the super format was to eliminate the minnows politely and focus on the big teams for a longer part of the tournament. Of course this backfired when Kenya and Zimbabwe (2003), and Ireland and Bangladesh (2007) advanced unexpectedly. Not their fault at all.

The problem now is that out of the pools of seven, lets say four are 'top level' teams. They will play 6 games among each other in a pool, and 12 in total. Out of 42 games, having only 12 'big team' games is ridiculous. Having one game a day also means that the tournament runs for nearly a month and a half.

The ICC took action and has reduced the number of teams for the 2015 edition. A typically blunt and poorly thought out answer, treating the symptom but ignoring the cause. Canadian captain Ashish Bagai rightfully pointed out that the associate teams need the world cup event as an aspiration.

Damned if they do. Damned if they don't. © Reuters

My Proposed Format
Too many teams the problem? I disagree, in fact I think there should be more teams. Consider the format I would like to see:

  • Two pools of eight teams
  • Pool A contains the eight highest ranked teams 
  • Pool B contains the next eight (the minnows)
  • The result is 28 games per pool, and 56 in total
  • Every day there is one match from pool B and one from pool A, pool play will end in approx. 30 days
  • The top 6 teams of pool A qualify for the playoffs, along with the top 2 teams from pool B
  • They will participate in a standard quarter finals format which runs for approx 8 days
This format works for me on many levels. It shortens the length of the world cup, greatly increases the number of competitive matches, and also increases exposure to the smaller cricketing nations. There is incentive for every team to play hard as teams will be eliminated from each pool. 

Lets Try It
I am going to play god for a moment. Say that the West Indies and New Zealand play poor cricket and don't make the top six cut, while in pool B Bangladesh and Ireland have strong showings and come out on top. The final pool standings looks something like this:

Pool A
  1. Australia
  2. India
  3. South Africa
  4. Pakistan
  5. Sri Lanka
  6. England
  7. West Indies
  8. New Zealand
Pool B
  1. Bangladesh
  2. Ireland
  3. Zimbabwe
  4. Netherlands
  5. Kenya
  6. Canada
  7. Afghanistan
  8. Scotland
Like most playoff formats, the top team (Australia-A1) will play the bottom team (Ireland-B2), A2 will play B1, and so on. I'd then split them up in such a way the top two teams (Australia A1 and India A2) are on either side of the playoffs draw, and converge to the final. The quarter finals will then become:
  • Australia vs Ireland (A1 vs B2)
  • Pakistan vs Sri Lanka (A4 vs A5)
  • South Africa vs England (A3 vs A6)
  • India vs Bangladesh (A2 vs B1)
You would then (probably) get semi-finals looking like:
  • Australia vs Pakistan
  • India vs South Africa
Alternatively you could have an elimination round where the two bottom placed pool A sides (West Indies, New Zealand) face the pool B winners (Bangladesh, Ireland) to decide the remaining two quarter final spots. 

Your thoughts? Do leave comments.